Monday, January 23, 2006

Post 7

:: CLICK HERE Before Reading Any Post ::

CATEGORY: CIRCLES

=========================================================

EULA (You lied)

=========================================================

Notice this Microsoft Eula or End User License Agreement:

GRANT OF LICENSE. This EULA grants you the following rights:
(Software Installation and Use. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this EULA, you may only install, use, access, run, or otherwise interact with ("RUN") one copy of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT on the COMPUTER. The SOFTWARE PRODUCT may not be installed, accessed, displayed, run, shared or used concurrently on or from different computers, including a workstation, terminal or other digital electronic device...

(Application Sharing. The SOFTWARE PRODUCT may contain Microsoft(r) NetMeeting, a product that enables applications to be shared between two or more computers, even if an application is installed on only one of the computers. You may use this technology with all Microsoft application products for multi-party conferences. For non-Microsoft applications, you should consult the accompanying license agreement or contact the licensor to determine whether application sharing is permitted by the licensor.

(Multiple Processor Version Selection. The CD or diskette(s) on which the SOFTWARE PRODUCT resides may contain several copies of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT, each of which is compatible with a different microprocessor architecture, such as the x86 architecture or various RISC architectures ("Processor Version(s)"). You may install and use only one copy of one Processor Version of the SOFTWARE PRODUCT on the COMPUTER.

Notice that you can't install more than one copy of the software (which all companies use) but companies have several machines and people, so they have to buy several copy licenses, which can cost a lot. Then to try to alleviate that cost they would just use the net meeting software that conveniently comes free to indirectly force networking computers; and though not the computer manufacturer, all use Microsoft/Intel operating system and hence networking of all the computer this way. A clever guise, which, if you look at the plain sense of it from a layman like me, why in ... can you stop me from putting the same software I purchase on all my computers. But their agenda is known and hopefully resolved. Sad to say this would be undetectable and hence doubt; for it would be convenient or solve a problem and hence look like the effect of a cause rather than an agenda. Similar to how the false prophet and beast will implement that Mark of Beast system by what prophecy teachers say that he "shall make craft prosper." In other words, he would solve the economic and financial problems with it; hence, it wouldn't be seen as an agenda or planned, but cause and effect and sometimes inevitable. Most often this economic and financial collapse would be falsely created to usher that in and this also can be undetectable, because it would seem as an evolution or normal everyday progressions; for example, "the boom and bust" theory. I'm simply the watchman on the wall, you "people among the people" know yourselves and who is who or who is what. I call it as I see it, you fix it or deal with the consequences; but the blood would be washed from my hands.

Notice micro-suns system notice in the Microsoft Eula, well not micro-suns themselves, but they are chief leaders responsible for java. Look at how powerful these four could be by controlling all computers:

"JAVA technology is not fault tolerant and is not designed, manufactured, or intended for use or resale as on-line control equipment in hazardous environments requiring fail-safe performance, such as in the operation of nuclear facilities, aircraft navigation or communication systems, air traffic control, direct life support machines, or weapons systems, in which the failure of JAVA technology could lead directly to death, personal injury, or severe physical or environmental damage."

Just the few examples of things java uses above is enough to be scary, "weapons systems." indeed if anyone had such capabilities to control these four companies would indeed have the capability to hold a technological advance country as the US hostage and easy take over. Not knowing who controls IBM or if they are authentic, though they call them "the big blue," most of the above systems would be designed by them but according to the magazine micro-sun system controls most of their mainframe networking.

Hence, concerning the first article on Real WMD about the four entities, Microsoft, Micro-Suns, Cern's World Wide Web and Apple:

EULA - You lied

NO EULA - No I didn't lie